Sourced

Sourced -- Signal landscape

The brand listening data landscape

A living view of which data sources brand teams are using to monitor perception, track share of voice, and catch issues before they escalate. Updated as the market shifts.

Updated June 2026·Maintained by Mulberry
Brand listening data landscapeQ3 2026 · Sourced by Mulberry · sourced.ccINTEGRATEDrunning todayIMPLEMENTINGactively addingINTERESTwatchingTwitter / X · 14YouTube · 14Instagram · 11Reddit · 11Facebook · 9Trustpilot · 2Google Reviews · 3TikTok · 15Threads · 5LinkedIn · 10Glassdoor · 5Pinterest · 5Bluesky · 4Snapchat · 1Integrated -- running todayImplementing -- actively addingInterest -- watchingDot size reflects tracked provider count in SourcedMovement this quarter
Free to use in decks and docs with attribution intact.

Integrated

Twitter / X

Twitter/X remains the primary real-time signal for brand mentions, crisis detection, and share-of-voice tracking despite significant platform volatility since 2022. Access tiers now vary sharply between providers -- the full firehose is no longer universally available and some providers are delivering partial coverage without disclosing the gap. Brand teams should audit their current provider's actual data delivery against historical benchmarks and maintain a secondary source for critical moments.

YouTube

YouTube is systematically underweighted in most brand monitoring stacks. Comment-level and caption-level data carries substantial signal for brand perception in consumer, entertainment, and CPG verticals, yet the majority of teams treat it as secondary to text platforms. Multiple enterprise providers now offer structured comment and transcript delivery at scale -- the gap between what is available and what teams are actually ingesting is significant.

Instagram

Instagram feed and comment coverage is standard across most enterprise brand monitoring deployments. Stories and Reels present ongoing structural data access challenges, but feed and comment monitoring is well-served by multiple providers with mature language and geo filtering. The platform's continued shift toward short-form video means comment and caption data on Reels is increasingly the higher-signal source compared to static post metrics.

Reddit

Reddit is where brand crises typically surface 24 to 72 hours before mainstream pickup. Subreddit-level monitoring for brand-adjacent communities -- not just keyword search across the platform -- is what separates effective coverage from reactive coverage. Enterprise providers now offer historical depth to 2010 and near-real-time delivery, but the quality of entity extraction and community classification varies substantially.

Facebook

Facebook coverage matters most for brand teams operating in regional markets, older demographics, and APAC where the platform retains dominant share. Group-level monitoring is structurally more difficult than page or public post monitoring and most providers have meaningful gaps here. Teams should verify whether their current provider is capturing group content and at what coverage rate before assuming full coverage.

Trustpilot

Trustpilot is the primary structured review source for brand reputation scoring in European and UK markets. Enterprise coverage is available from a small number of providers. Deduplication and historical completeness varies -- teams running sentiment tracking over time should verify that the provider's historical archive matches what is publicly visible on the platform before committing to a baseline.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews carries disproportionate brand signal for service businesses, local brands, and hospitality -- categories where search-driven review volume is highest. Coverage at the location level is available from multiple providers, but keeping pace with new location additions requires either proactive configuration or a provider with automated discovery built in.


Implementing

TikTok

TikTok crossed into active integration for brand monitoring over the past 18 months as brand events increasingly originate on short-form video before moving to text platforms. Enterprise data access is more structurally complex than traditional social due to platform restrictions, but several providers have established reliable structured delivery at scale. Caption-level and audio transcript data is now available from the stronger providers -- teams that are only tracking hashtags are missing the majority of relevant signal.

Threads

Threads is being added to brand monitoring stacks primarily in consumer, lifestyle, and media verticals where Meta audiences are concentrated. Volume is lower than X for breaking news but the platform's algorithmic amplification of brand conversations is different in structure and reach. Provider access is cleaner than X given Meta's more stable API posture, and several providers have added Threads to existing social packages without significant incremental cost.

LinkedIn

LinkedIn monitoring is standard for B2B brand tracking but adoption is accelerating in enterprise and professional services verticals that have historically focused only on consumer platforms. Employee sentiment, executive brand signals, and competitive hiring narrative are increasingly monitored alongside traditional brand mentions. Data access is governed by LinkedIn's strict API terms, and the handful of providers with reliable structured access are meaningfully differentiated from those using more fragile collection methods.

Glassdoor

Glassdoor has moved from a nice-to-have into a required source for employer brand monitoring programs, particularly at companies where talent acquisition and public perception are managed together. Structured review access is available from several providers. Teams should pay attention to whether their provider is covering anonymous reviews alongside attributed ones, as the anonymous content carries different signal characteristics.


Interest

Pinterest

Pinterest is entering brand monitoring conversations in consumer goods, home, and lifestyle verticals where the platform drives significant purchase intent. Data access is more limited than text-based platforms but pin and board-level analysis is increasingly available. Visual brand tracking on Pinterest requires different analytical approaches than text monitoring -- teams should evaluate whether their monitoring stack can actually process visual content or is only capturing caption and description text.

Bluesky

Bluesky is relevant for brand teams with audiences in tech, journalism, and policy verticals, where early-adopter migration from X has been most pronounced. Volume remains low relative to established platforms but the AT Protocol's open architecture makes data access structurally more reliable long-term than closed platforms with opaque API policies. Teams should begin watching coverage quality now rather than waiting for volume to justify it.

Snapchat

Snapchat carries brand signal that is almost entirely invisible to standard monitoring stacks -- Stories, Spotlight, and public content that is not indexed by conventional collection methods. A small number of providers have developed access to public Snapchat content. For brands with significant Gen Z audiences or consumer verticals where Snapchat skews, the gap between what is being monitored and what is being discussed is likely larger than most teams realize.

Evaluating providers from this list? Test them on KeyKit before you commit.

Test a provider on KeyKit

The providers behind every source on this page are listed on Sourced.

Request access

Access is gated. Mulberry reviews all buyers before granting entry.

Want Mulberry to do the sourcing for you? Talk to Mulberry

Other landscapes

Media monitoringNarrative intelligenceOSINTCompetitive intelThreat intelligence